Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Urban Bard: Toronto's Coolest Classical Company

Urban Bard is unlike any company I've ever seen. It is exactly what its name suggests, urban bard, nothing more or less. This season's contrasting productions of the uber popular Twelfth Night and the sadly obscure Two Noble Kinsmen are innovative to the point where I was literally giggling in delight at every scene change.

The set up of both plays (alternating performance nights throughout the run) is brilliant but somehow simple. Both productions begin at the giant fountain in College Park in Toronto. A slightly confused group of patrons gravitates towards 2 ushers passing around a donations box (pay what you can- the inclusive policy of the everyman theatre company). Some have brought picnics, others lawn chairs, they will soon realize that neither of these were a very good idea. When the play is set to begin, audience members take a seat around the edge of the fountain, or stand a little out of the way, unsure of where they should go. A dramatic splashing is heard, the audience snaps to attention and the production is off to the races.

In Twelfth Night (a remount of last year's production) the play has been reordered so we begin with the captain's rescue of Viola from drowning at sea. Doran Damon Okkema, a lively and surprisingly memorable captain, frantically trudges his way across the epic fountain, Lindsey Alston as Viola flung unceremoniously over his strong shoulder. Finally reaching the shore, he lays the unconscious Viola at the audience's feet and urgently begins CPR. Coughing up water, a dazed Viola awakes and asks the production's opening question: "what country is this?". The captain has no sooner taken Viola to fetch a male disguise than Sebastian (Ned Petrie) and Antonio (Casey Hudecki) appear from a subterranean stairwell already mid conversation. The audience wheels around to observe the new scene before them (completely out of the original order) and the excitement builds as understanding dawns of what kind of production we're now a part of.

After the initial scenes at the fountain (Kinsmen begins on the opposite shore with soldiers charging through the water to find the unconscious Arcite and Palamon ready for capture, a less effective but still enticing beginning), the audience is led through College Park by the ushers, now carrying large red flags to help shepherd the herd from scene to scene and serve as boundary lines not to be crossed.

Twelfth Night's audience descends immediately into the courtyard where the rest of the play is to take place, led by a most remarkable Feste (Christopher Mott) who's "follow me"-ish song is the "food of love" music Orsino speaks of when we arrive at his palace. The fact that it seems palatial is one of the most remarkable things about Urban Bard's approach. Orsino (Gordon Noel) is actually lazing about on a simple bench in a mostly concrete courtyard outside a mall. He has a couple attendants: Curio, Valentine, Viola (already planted as "Cesario") and the captain (either cleverly playing the role of Viola's confidant and co-conspirator or double cast as a palace guard, I'm choosing to believe it was intentionally the former, a distinctly interesting choice), but no other trappings of royalty furnish Orsino's court. Noel, a giddy and oddly optimistic Orsino, sells the locale with his air of entitlement and comfort.

Helen Juvonen brings a similar decadence to Olivia's home on the opposite side of the concrete expanse. A compellingly cold but sometimes irritatingly shrill Olivia, Juvonen's best moment is her first entrance, descending a dramatic staircase into the courtyard dressed in full Eva Peron-ish mourning diva apparel. The entire production plays out in the various locations about the courtyard. Balconies, staircases, benches, picnic tables, flower beds, any and all possible uses of the single simple courtyard were taken advantage of in most ingenious ways. A particularly memorable sequence finds the audience gazing up at the second floor balcony of the College Park Mall to watch Sir Andrew (Tyler Seguin) and Viola's pathetic fight only to have their attention diverted as a swashbuckling Antonio storms in at ground level, interrupting with a spectacular show of stage combat swordsmanship.

It's as if the island of Illyria crash landed in central Toronto, paying no mind to the anachronisms of unavoidable modern interruptions. Cell phones sound, a group of stoners playing poker at a nearby picnic table laugh interruptingly, and at more than one point a toddler wonders sweetly into a scene, or an actor, or a set piece. But the play goes on, the actors adjusting, incorporating or improvising around the complications. Illyria disrupts Toronto about as much as Toronto disrupts Illyria. Startled passerby gawk at the strangely-dressed people speaking in iambic pentameter; chatting locals stare from their evening perches in the courtyard; the aforementioned stoners roll their eyes at the thespians intruding on their usually quiet poker space. But as the strangeness wears off, the courtyard's regular inhabitants begin to settle in to watch the story play out. A wandering hippie joins the crowd, a pair of conservative Muslim families usher their kids over to the action, a casual drag queen meanders into the group and the stoners start to pay attention. By the time the players reach curtain call, their audience has more than doubled from the modest group that began with them at the fountain. It's truly a remarkable thing to see.

Much of the play was remarkable in many ways. Both of them were really. From Twelfth Night's brilliantly blocked letter-reading scene to the single greatest Antonio I've ever encountered (absolutely hilarious- and female to boot!), the whole thing bled innovation. The wonderful Feste is at once a consummate performance artist, a playful buffoon, a wise man and a loyal bro. A strong willed and at times righteously angry Viola lacks the character's beautiful melancholy but paired with a sympathetic Sebastian, the two actually seem like they could be mistaken for one another (a rare thing for most companies).

Two Noble Kinsmen uses a similar approach and is similarly triumphant. Taking advantage of a grate and nearby flower bed as the prison and the garden outside its window, Kinsmen spends more time above ground before descending into Twelfth Night's courtyard. Once there, it is used to similar effect, though somewhat more dependent on the balcony effect created by playing scenes on the ground level with the audience looking up.

The least-produced of all of Shakespeare's works, Two Noble Kinsmen (co-written by John Fletcher) resonates interestingly in a modern context, something Urban Bard effectively brings to the forefront in their production. The story of Arcite and Palamon, as played by Erick Fournier and Christopher Sironi, is essentially that of a bromance and the girl who gets in the way (Tammy Everett). It is a wonderful story, based on Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, that brought about tears and laughter from its audience.

The most (read: only) intriguing female part belongs to the remarkable Adrianna Prosser as the unnamed "jailer's daughter", the spiraling unrequited lover who owns the story's subplot. The kingdom of Athens is held down by a forgettable Hippolyta (Tori Elliott) and a possibly miscast Theseus (Luke Marty, one of the youngest cast members taking on the singular authoritative role of the play. Though Marty is greatly matured from the promising grade nine I witnessed playing Nicely Nicely in Guys and Dolls). The ingenue role of Emilia belongs to Tammy Everett, who was significantly more successful here than as an overly self-congratulating Maria in Twelfth Night.

The key roles of Arcite and Palamon are captured proficiently but not spectacularly by Fournier and Sironi. Fournier, a disappointingly cowardly Tybalt in last year's Canopy Theatre Romeo and Juliet, brings his remarkable stage combat skills to a less intimidating role and Sironi makes the remarkable jump from Twelfth Night's typically priggish Malvolio to a not-quite-dashing-enough-but-still-decently-dashing Palamon. The two able but flawed actors truly soar in their final moments together. The best friends' final embrace before their duel is heartwrenching and Arcite's final speech truly touching. Urban Bard's capable cast made me fall in love with Two Noble Kinsmen in my very first experience with the play.

Ultimately, it's director (and Urban Bard Artistic Director) Scott Moyle who should be credited for the remarkably unique experience of Urban Bard's summer 2010 productions. His ingenious use of space, excellent sense of character and altogether clever direction is what sets these 2 productions apart from the masses of independently produced Shakespeare out there. The program for Twelfth Night and Two Noble Kinsmen says that Urban Bard was "born out of a love for the city of Toronto". Nothing is more obvious in these productions than respect for the landscape they exist in. Urban Bard is a feature this Torontonian hopes never disappears from said landscape.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Next Season in Stratford

The Stratford Shakespeare Festival has just announced their 2011 roster. Here are the highlights (and lowlights):

Richard III: it's a great play, fascinating really. But it is 99.9% dependent on a truly solid leading man. It needs someone who will bring something new to the part and keep the audience interested pretty much single handedly. So let's talk innovation- Stratford's handed the remarkable role to one of their greatest leading LADIES, Seana McKenna. I simply cannot wait to see what she does with it. I'm all for the festival opening up parts to women. Let's cast based on who tackles it best, not on anatomy! Richard III will go up in the Tom Patterson Theatre, a perfect space for an innovative Richard.

The flagship production of the season will be the grossly over-performed Twelfth Night. It will be, as most predictably popular things seem to be, directed by Artistic Director Des McAnuff and will feature American film star (and Tony award winner) Brian Dennehy as Sir Toby. Stratford regular Stephen Ouimette will play Sir Andrew. Considering I associate the role with Michael Therriault circa 2001, Ouimette seems like an odd chronological choice but whatever. If I seem unexcited about this (PREDICTABLE) production, my boredom will be cured by the usually formulaic Malvolio. One of my absolute favourite Stratford performers, Tom Rooney, will be taking on the role and hopefully will bring his signature chameleon unpredictability with him. Another highlight is sure to be Ben Carlson as Feste. Carlson (an erstwhile blah Hamlet) is at his best in comedic parts and is sure to be a delight.

Rooney will also appear as Ford in The Merry Wives of Windsor at the festival theatre. Merry Wives, a nice obscure surprise opposite Twelfth Night, will be directed by Frank Galati, an import with impressive credentials. I'd like to take this moment to point out my frustration at all the importing of "names" instead of developing talent, but that is neither here nor there. The most exciting thing about Merry Wives is the casting of uber-talent Geraint Wyn Davies in the iconic role of Falstaff. Please let this be an early indication that maybe the festival will take on the Henriad soon! Wyn Davies would be superb as Falstaff throughout the entire canon (and don't you think Prince Hal is a role Dion Johnstone is screamingly ready for? or maybe Gareth Potter, pushing beyond his supposed romantic lead limits?).

And speaking of pushing limits, the fourth Shakespeare slated for next season is the grotesquely challenging Titus Andronicus. Plagued with issues of race, rape and insurmountable violence, Titus can be sensational or sensationally bad. The press release contained absolutely no details on the production save for it's location (The Tom Patterson, which will make for an eerily intimate experience), no director, no cast, no nothing. It's truly the wild card of the season.

For musicals, first up is Jesus Christ Superstar. Despite it's catchy and sometimes affecting writing, I'm pretty sure I will hate Jesus Christ Superstar at Stratford. Firstly, I barely made it through the monstrosity of Des McAnuff's A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Forum last season, which does not bode well for his musical direction style (yes, I know he's won Tonys, but not for actually good musicals). Secondly, something has to be done about the Stratford musical casting. I cannot possibly be the only person not enchanted by Chilina Kennedy; I find her one-note, affected and blankly sweet. Maria was passable but far from the highlight of last season's wonderful West Side Story so casting her right out of the gate as one of JCS's leads just seems like a mistake. Overall, this does not sound promising. Paul Nolan (last season's Tony and a classical player this season as Orlando in As You Like It) held his own significantly better in West Side and may prove a surprisingly adept Jesus. Time will tell on this one.

The other musical planned for 2011 is in the exact opposite position. While JSC is a pretty good musical, Camelot is mediocre at best. But while the festival is attempting new territory (and bad casting) with JSC, Camelot already has a successful Stratford history. It was one of the first productions I ever saw at the festival and starred some of the biggest names (Cynthia Dale) and biggest talent (Michael Therriault) Stratford's ever seen. Next year's Camelot will star Geraint Wyn Davies, one of the finest performers currently working, who is sure to bring enough charisma to the role of King Arthur that the audience will give the libretto a free pass for its mediocrity.

Stratford vet Brian Bedford will once again take on the impractical task of directing himself, this time in The Misanthrope at the festival theatre. Hit and miss superstar Ben Carlson will play Alceste. The season will also see General Director Antoni Cimolino take on The Grapes of Wrath starring Chilina Kennedy and Janet Wright, and Jennifer Tarver's interpretation of The Homecoming starring Brian Dennehy and Stephen Ouimette. The studio theatre will see Hosanna by French-Canadian playwright Michel Tremblay and a new play commissioned by the festival in 2008 called The Little Years (by John Mighton).

The festival also announced a new commission, a musical from Bob Martin, Don McKellar, Lisa Lamert and Greg Morrison (aka the Drowsy Chaperone people). May I point out that that is the kind of musical Stratford should be doing- small, original and Canadian. It's not classical, but it is promising. We'll see in a couple of years when it makes it to the stage.

Highlights (female Richard, great roles for Tom Rooney and Geraint Wyn Davies), Wildcards (Titus, an original play, the obscure Merry Wives in the hard-to-sell-out festival theatre) and Bad Ideas (Chilina Kennedy? Really?), next season at Stratford should be interesting.
Reviews of all 12 current Stratford productions will be posted throughout the summer.

Saturday, June 19, 2010

The Mad World of the RLD

The Red Light District Theatre Company is just a little bit crazy. As the tagline for their most recent production, Woyzeck, says, the company stands "just over the little dash between yes and no". From their bum fight-inspired Titus to "the play about dancing robots and communists" to this run of Woyzeck, The RLD is constantly striving for innovation. A quote from their website seems to sum up the introspective artistic intellectualism that seems to embody the company, "what are we afraid of? the answer, in theatre as in life, is invariably ourselves. And so from the ashes of revelation we must rouse, and we must rise, and we must, absolutely, revolt." What are we afraid of? RLD springs from a question and in their attempts to answer it they only strive to ask even more.

I asked director (and RLD artistic director) Ted Witzel what it was he wanted the audience to take away from Woyzeck. His reply? "I hope they're asking 'what the fuck is wrong with the world?'." Witzel knew he wanted to tackle Woyzeck because he was sure that German playwrite Georg Buchner had a lot more to say than any English translation ever let on. "Most people take it to a place of domestic tragedy" said Witzel, but he was determined to convey the many forces pressing down on Woyzeck, driving him mad. In conjunction with his mentor, German director Johanna Schall, Witzel set about creating his own translation of the unfinished play.

The product was a meticulous translation that gave in English what Witzel believed was the genius of the original German: "I had this idea that there was something more going on in the original. Buchner is really clever in the ways he plays with grammar and syntax. He invented this fake dialect to do a case study of the poor people in Germany at the time. Having to develop a new syntax for each character in the play was a really interesting challenge". While brilliant details such as the waltz rhythm of Woyzeck's obssessively repeated line "ever so" may slip by unnoticed by anyone not granted personal insight into Witzel's intellectually stunning interpretation, the distinct syntax of each character was unmistakable.

With both his translation and his directorial work, Witzel also succeeded in tapping into what he emphasized as an integral aspect of Woyzeck as an artistic examination. The world Witzel created around Woyzeck was indeed a mad one. The character's life played out as a literal and metaphorical circus. The oppressive forces that tortured Woyzeck froze omnipresently in grotesque tableau when they left the stage, their existence haunting Woyzeck from the very walls that surrounded him. Marie's affair played out as a cage match between lion and tamer, the Doctor's experiments as a sideshow act. The interactions between the Captain and the Doctor seemed to exist in a time warp as the two went through the motions of their little dance time and time again. In this circus world where time is immeasurable and the lines between person, place and thing are invisible, madness seems the only option. Witzel's Woyzeck is far from the simplified domestic tragedy he spoke of; it's a tragedy of one man's entire world.

My conversation with director Ted Witzel served as an invaluable tool in my processing of the complexly strange production. Inexperienced with the Brechtian tradition of experimental theatre, there was simply no hope of my connecting with Woyzeck save for Witzel's insight. His joy at recounting RLD's earliest productions and the slyly guilty way he confessed to having not actually read Woyzeck when it was assigned to him in University allowed me to take RLD's intimidatingly artistic trappings in stride. For every polarizingly "alternative" sentence on the website, Witzel had a correspondingly down-to-earth counterpoint: as much as the company may stand for high minded boundary-pushing, it was realistically founded so that a bunch of inspired people could put on a show that no one else would back. RLD's production of Woyzeck was much like Witzel himself: it had a distinct point of view, a definite style and an intimidating turn of phrase but was ultimately as understandable as anything.

In a superb cast filled with incomparable energy and 110% commitment, Eve Wylden stood out as an actress of astronomical talent. Her off-kilter interpretation of the doctor was startling, upsetting and altogether mesmerizing. The creepy way she smiled just a little too big and moved her head just a little too much gave her doctor a tangible element of dangerous joy. As for the rest, I took an immediate dislike to Lauren Gillis as Marie, which was, I believe, the point. Fearless actress Gillis took to the untrustworthy character and was unrelenting as she irked me for the remainder of the evening. Whitney Ross-Barris, in multiple roles amalgamated into one singing bearded lady, was an omnipresent multitalent, giving volume to a world of voices in Woyzeck's head as well as many outside of it. Julian Dezotti delivered the night's clearest performance as the clown who seemed somehow the sanest at the circus. His grand speeches touched even the most cynical of audience members and his presence held all the command of a classically trained actor. Mike Mackinnon, Marcel Dragonieri and Brandon Hackett rounded out the cast nicely as distinct contributors to Woyzeck's mad world. Woyzeck himself, Reid Linforth, handled the part aptly, conveying a constant sense of unease and bringing the audience right along with him on his experience of insanity. With easily the most poetically troublesome syntax, Linforth was remarkable in his ability to convey meaning and intention behind layers of muddled words and seeming madness. He created pathos for a murderer, which speaks for itself.

Before the performance, Witzel spoke of the importance of institutionalization. It was almost alarming the ease with which he rattled off the names of gruesome murderers from recent history. But it was the quote "no one stabs someone in the head 40 times in his right mind" that somehow drove home the essence of what Witzel was getting at with Woyzeck. As a society are we mad for ignoring those showing signs of madness? Witzel points out that almost everyone at some point cries for help, as he believes Woyzeck does, and it is the world's responsibility to take them in and help. Instead, those crying are usually ostracized and pushed further down the rabbit hole, often with psychopathic consequences. The madness never gets a chance to heal in a world intolerant of madness. So Witzel, through Woyzeck, wants his audience to ask: "What the fuck is wrong with the world?".

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Observations from the Tonys

I participated in a conference call with host Sean Hayes earlier this week and was not impressed. The man had never been to the Tonys before and had only seen one of the nominated productions (Red). Top that off with the occasional rude comment, his repetition of the fact that he has no hosting ambitions and his absolute refusal to answer any questions at all in response to the controversial Newsweek article that had everything to do with him and I held little hope for his hosting job. But all things considered, he did okay.

More Observations:
  • Boy that piano solo that opened the show was impressive. Great idea actually, way to show off his talents specifically instead of the typical song and dance number that would elicit comparisons to his predecessors.
  • Sherie Renee Scott! I wish I could see her show, she's my favourite Broadway performer.
  • Daniel Radcliffe is VERY short. And Katie Holmes has become a zombie since her charming Joey Potter days.
  • ScarJo (Featured Actress in a Play: View From the Bridge) got to talk for an hour but was wearing a pretty dress and thanked "her Canadian" (my love/her husband Ryan Reynolds) so it was okay.
  • Featured Actor in a Play Eddie Redmayne (Red) is an unbelievably eloquent dude and now I really want to see Red.
  • Actually, after watching the introductions to the nominated original plays I want to see all of them.
  • This thing is terribly directed. So many technical problems and embarrassing incidents.
  • Frasier and Niles together! That's amazing, they were adorable. And they both belong on the Tony stage (unlike many of the screen stars there).
  • Katie Finneran (Featured Actress in a Musical: Promises, Promises) is adorable.
  • Why is a NY Jet presenting? WEIRD.
  • Okay, none of the musicals really look that good (and I love musicals), except maybe Memphis, that was kinda fun. No, scratch that, Ragtime, now that's musical theatre people!
  • This whole ordeal is obnoxiously Hollywood. Why are there more movie stars than stage stars? I mean theatre people, not screen people who dabble in theatre.
  • I'm just going to put this out there: I find Kristen Chenoweth annoying of late. I used to love her but she's just too much sometimes.
  • Michael from Camp is nominated for a Tony! Awesome.
  • After seeing the performances on this show so far I agree wholeheartedly with Levi Kreis' win for Million Dollar Quartet (Featured Actor in a Musical).
  • Holy Mumbler Batman! I couldn't hear a word Catherine Zeta Jones was singing: would you people please learn to enunciate! She was altogether unimpressive I thought.
  • Idina Menzel- way to remind me of the true greatness that Broadway can achieve... (interrupted thought) holy crap that Ragtime lady can sing!
  • Viola Davis (Lead Actress in a Play: Fences) may be crying but she looks like she could pack a serious punch, I'm distracted by her biceps.
  • Where is Jude Law (Hamlet)? He obviously wasn't going to win but it's a jerk move not to show up.
  • Denzel? I was sure Alfred Molina had it. I never seem to agree when Denzel wins anything.
  • Hey Will Smith, I love you. I have for years and always will.
  • Michael Douglas reminds me that Avenue Q beat out Wicked for Best Musical in 2004, as much as I love Avenue Q, that will always remains a complete travesty.
  • Great dress Paula!
  • Oh, the choreography performances were great. Excellent sitting Sean, really impressive! That first comment was sincere, the second not so much.
  • Not so sure I agree with Bill T Jones for Best Choreography for Fela! I also didn't think he should have won for the stomping and jumping in Spring Awakening but alas he did.
  • The fact that the crowd seemed to recognize few people more than I did made me sad. Someone there should have known those casting directors and writers. I was also ashamed that I was only now finding out about the death of Dixie Carter (stage actress and one of my favourite stars of Designing Women), that was very sad.
  • Red wins best play, I have a feeling that's exactly appropriate. Writer John Logan gives a lovely speech, producer lady reads a prepared one- boo.
  • Was the Glee cast really necessary? They're both such talented theatre people but the overexposure is making it progressively harder to separate Lea Michele and Matthew Morrison from the annoying Rachel Berry and Mr. Schue. Michele can really wail and I do love her "Don't Rain on My Parade" but the girl is getting too big for her britches, that was way over the top. But way to chum it up with bff Jonathan Groff and innocently flirt with Jay Z, that was charming.
  • Julie Taymor's directing Spider Man the musical? That sounds horrible. Not the Taymor part, the Spider Man part.
  • Wow, I hate Raquel Welch. Must she wiggle "seductively" as she attempts to read a piece of paper?
  • I haven't made it to Broadway this season (sadly) but I'm going to guess that Ragtime should have had Best Revival instead of La Cage Aux Folles.
  • I'm thinking they should have picked an American Idiot song that didn't need as much censorship for network TV but that show looks pretty darn cool. Weird but cool. Maybe even awesome.
  • In what world does Catherine Zeta Jones beat out Sherie Renee Scott? I mean she is a bigger star, in a bigger show with a bigger cast and more money and blah blah blah but it's musical theatre and when it comes to acting and singing there's one correct answer, and it's not Zeta Jones. Also, what a strange acceptance speech, clearly her head was not totally on.
  • Memphis wins best musical, which I totally didn't see coming. But I'm glad a jukebox musical didn't win (at least I don't think it's a jukebox musical, even if it was written by the guy from Bon Jovi). It means good things for the industry to acknowledge original works, no matter how cool American Idiot may be.
Overall a pretty enjoyable evening on the grand scale of awards shows. I want to go to Broadway so badly, I have to see Red, Next Fall, American Idiot, Memphis and (sadly already closed) Ragtime, among others.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Cawrk Productions Impresses Me

Perhaps the greatest thing about the production of The Glass Menagerie that I saw last week was the company behind the production. Cawrk Theatrical Productions, founded by Catherine Bernardi and Matthew Yipchuck, was invented as a creative outlet during the transitioning years while the young artistic directors left behind Cawthra Park Secondary School and moved on to study at York University (Cawthra+ York= Cawrk... get it?). The company, now 5 productions old, is a low-key testament to youthful initiative. All over the GTA young performers, directors and writers are scrounging for parts, for jobs, for creative outlets. They're working their way up ladders, fetching coffee for the assistant to the assistant director and biding their time in the chorus. But these kids, they decided to work from the top of the company down, directing their own shows and casting as they saw fit. Now aren't those the sort of people who's work you want to watch?

And their work certainly proved worthy of such go-getter creative minds. Tennesee Williams' The Glass Menagerie played June 2-5 at the Theatre Passe Muraille Backspace in Toronto's super hip Queen West district. The space itself was lovely (an intimate blackbox with a brilliantly utilized side balcony) and suited the production perfectly. Director Matthew Yipchuck emphasized the "memory play" aspect of the piece, giving it surreal qualities to remind the audience that they are seeing the story not as it was but as poetic Tom Wingfield chooses to recall it. This proved incredibly effective both as an artistic choice and an innovative way for a young company to keep their costs down. The actors mimed the use of most props (including plates of food, doors and the glass animals in Laura's titular menagerie). Costuming was simple yet suggestive. The lighting design by Shannon Fewster was inspired, beautifully augmenting the action and the directorial dream-like concept. Film clips and slideshow elements were projected to the back of the stage at designated points during the production. This choice sometimes distracted from the live action but also effectively emphasized Tom's obsession with the movies and how that influenced his retelling of the tale. Beautiful film-like score was provided at crucial moments by an omnipresent pianist (Tom Kerr) situated in the balcony and lit theatrically with a single red light. This was perhaps my favourite directorial choice of the production as it was incredibly effective in creating the ambiance of memory while adding to the action, never detracting. The use of space was impressive, using suggestive furniture and room partitions to allow flow from scene to scene without interruption. Overall, the direction was innovative and incredibly effective.

The actors were similarly successful, if not as consistent. As the key character of Laura Wingfield, Catherine Bernardi was charming, sometimes overly so. The handicapped and socially inept Laura was portrayed healthily and with great sympathy, a choice that bothered me at first but later grew on me. Jim's lines tell the audience that Laura is far less crippled (physically and socially) than she considers herself and since the play exists in Tom's memory it is possible that he would see his sister in her best possible incarnation, making Bernardi's portrayal spot-on. The pathos inspired by Bernardi's pretty, mournful eyes was remarkable, even when she was at times a little off kilter in the complexly layered role. The audience was fully on her side throughout, a great achievement with such a cloistered character.

In contrast, Josh Dolphin's portrayal of storyteller Tom was not as charming as I would have liked. The weakest among a generally very strong cast, Dolphin held his own but lacked the ease of a seasoned narrator guiding the audience through his experiences. He forged a nice connection with Bernardi's Laura but lost the audiences affections easily in Tom's shiftier moments and generally struggled with enunciation, a debilitating flaw in even the most talented of performers. Ingrid Wirsig's matriarch Amanda Wingfield suffered under a similar problem: a necessary but limiting southern accent. The southern belle's drawl was well executed but so penetrating that it often drew attention away from the content of her speech. Hopscotching the line between affected and affecting, Wirsig soared splendidly at points and fell to caricature in others.

The cast member who most hit home with me was Eze Angius as Jim O'Connor. Angius lit up the stage as the all-too-recognizable fallen highschool hero. Jim's incredible kindness to Laura rang truthfully and Angius' chemistry with Bernardi was palpable. Playing the well-intentioned "gentleman caller" with dangerous charm, Angius raised our hopes and dashed our hearts right alongside Laura's, making him the most striking actor in an easily under-appreciated role.

Cawrk Theatrical Productions can celebrate a great achievement in The Glass Menagerie. With innovative direction and a strong cast executing Tennessee Williams' classic with precision and ease, the production was an overall success.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Singing Schmuel Songs to Vetoed Productions

The Last Five Years is one of my favourite things ever written for the stage. In it, composer Jason Robert Brown shares a uniquely personal story of the 5 year relationship between him and his wife that ended in broken vows, a broken marriage and broken hearts. Standing in for their real life counterparts are the tangibly real characters of Jamie and Cathy: two of musical theatre's greatest creations in one of musical theatre's most poignant stories.

Cathy tells the story of the couple's five year relationship in reverse, beginning with her heartbreak in "I'm Still Hurting" and culminating in dramatically ironic and torturous hope in "Goodbye Until Tomorrow". Jamie tells the story chronologically from their first meeting, "Shiksa Goddess", to the day he decides on divorce in "I Could Never Rescue You".
The audience sees every event in perspective-skewed detail twice: through the eyes of the suddenly successful writer desperate to enjoy his success, and those of the struggling actress who can't seem to catch a break.We see Jamie sweetly support Cathy's dreams and her resent his. We see Cathy put her heart in Jamie's hands and him smash it to pieces. We learn that Jamie "has to be in love with someone" and Cathy just wants to be loved at all. We see him support her until he can't anymore and her try to hold on to him until he won't let her anymore. We see her drive him away and him trample all over the vows they made until there's nothing left but hurt.

There has been great debate among contemporary musical theatre lovers over who is in the wrong in the story of The Last Five Years. One of the most knowledgeable thespians I know is determined that the play is meant to be Jason Robert Brown (aka Jamie)'s apology letter to his ex wife (aka Cathy), an outright admission of guilt and an explanation of his actions. Others believe that there are only so many "Schmuel Song"s one can sing and the play frames Jamie as the hero who tried all he could to rescue a damsel who was incapable of being rescued. But I think the genius of The Last Five Years is that neither is true; Jamie and Cathy are too complicated for black and white assignments of guilt. The Last Five Years shows us a relationship so real that I see people I know in every action or inaction Jamie and Cathy take. These characters are as complicated as the human beings they were inspired by. They both hurt and are hurt, love and are loved; there's nothing simple about it.

And for every complicated character motivation in The Last Five Years there's a brilliantly composed musical number every bit as complicated in itself. From hilarious and intellectual lyrics to the hardest vocals in modern musical theatre, the libretto of The Last Five Years matches every bit of the genius of its story and characters. Absolute instrumental mastery is required to pull off the challenging orchestration and a voice that can tackle the range of one of the two roles is a rare thing. Jamie and Cathy require actors who can make an audience laugh, cry and fall in love within the space of 90 minutes. They have to sell character selfishness and hopelessness, heroics and vanity while abandoning all vanity themselves to come down to the gritty human level of these supremely flawed characters. They have to let the audience hate them and demand that they love them.

A Last Five Years director is starring down the barrel of a gun the minute they decide to produce the play. They have to find actors up to the task then teach them how to do it with poignancy. A music director has to translate Brown's impossible score with precision on all fronts without losing the emotional resonance. A director has to navigate the play's troublesome structure without distracting from its low-frills core. The Last Five Years is simply an impossible undertaking.


So when Vetoed Productions, a new student-founded theatre company in Toronto, announced the undertaking I marked it down in my calendar as an event not to be missed. The emotional maturity and professional technique required for The Last Five Years made it a longshot for a student company success but if anyone could do it it would be Bishop Strachan School girls striking out on their own with the valuable support of their teacher Brandon Allen.

The production was a mixed bag of achievements that was ultimately a surprising success.

Despite some over-directed bits (air quotes, mimed jokes and emphatic hand gestures were a bit too prevalent), the direction was innovative and well thought out. First-time director Emily Kassie navigated the logistically difficult musical with great ease. The set, a large multi-layered round structure resembling a wedding cake, was functional and worked metaphorically with its clock-inspired markings contributing to the looming theme of inevitability in the play. It allowed for interesting movement and levels, played with shadows and encouraged fluid scene transitions. The lighting was simple but well executed and exactly appropriate to the piece (the one weak point being the heavy-handed use of a red gel for "Nobody Needs To Know"). The costumes and props enhanced the piece and characters without being distracting or cumbersome. Blocking generally kept the audience engaged, allowing the songs to tell their own story without over-complication. Some directed character moments were unconventional (and, arguably, detrimental) such as the quieter take on the usually boisterous ending of "I Can Do Better Than That", the early establishment of Jamie's seedy side with an overt sex joke in "Shiksa Goddess" and a sheepish rather than proud approach to "A Part of That". But overall, it was a cleverly directed piece.


The pit band, for the most part, stumbled through Jason Robert Brown's unimaginably difficult score with proficiency. However, the string section seemed lost at times, as if the talented players had underestimated the rehearsals necessary to master Brown's songs. Music director Scott Orr kept his band on track, in time and well balanced while, not perfectly, but competently, tackling the piano part himself. At times the weaknesses in the string section (particularly violin) or a fumbled piano solo detracted from the piece, but the pit has to be commended for managing the insane score at all; there were certainly times when they added brilliant layers to the action (the cello part in "Still Hurting", in particular, was beautiful).


But it was the hearts of the piece, Jamie and Cathy who ultimately determined my opinion of the production.

Julien Cyr, as Jamie, started off really weak.
The part seemed out of his vocal and acting range, his performance laboured. As he struggled through Jamie's demanding first 2 songs "Shiksa Goddess" and "Moving Too Fast", he seemed outmatched; some phrases even had to be sung out of octave or speak-sung. However, once he reached Jamie's third number, the all-important "Schmuel Song", Cyr hit his stride. From there he held on and did a decent enough job through to the end, with a couple weak points throughout. Cyr struggled to balance Jamie's sincere sweetness with his darker side, often times missing the mark on both. But when he was on he was on, charming the audience fully with an endearingly goofy and honest "Schmuel Song" and tugging at heartstrings in the mournful "If I Didn't Believe in You" (in my opinion the two linchpin songs of Jamie's character). The production's low point, "Nobody Needs to Know", was a disappointment not entirely Cyr's fault with lights, direction, pit, vocals and acting all under-performing on Jamie's important last plea for understanding. He sounded spectacular on the occasional note that sat right in his comfort zone (the "na na na na"s in "Schmuel Song" and "hold on"s in "Nobody Needs to Know" stuck out as strong) but ultimately proved no match for the role (which, let me emphasize again, is one of the toughest ever written, hardly ever played completely effectively). In general, though he managed alright, Cyr seemed less comfortable in his role than his costar.

On the other end of the spectrum, one of Toronto's best young performers, Kate Ryan, outdid all the high expectations I had for her. Greatly matured since her early days in Toronto Youth Theatre (Lucky Stiff, Robin Hood), Ryan's
brilliant voice has only gotten stronger and her acting has improved immensely. She was brilliant throughout the entire piece, belting out notes her small frame would never have suggested she could hit. Her acting and character sense shone right alongside her one-of-a-kind voice as she tackled Cathy's funny numbers ("Summer in Ohio", "I Can Do Better Than That"), tragic songs ("I'm Still Hurting", "See I'm Smiling") and every complex note in between. Heartbreaking acting in the small moments (especially the show-starting "I'm Still Hurting") easily made up for the occasional over-the-top performance (a pitfall of her earlier work). Ryan nailed the all-important "See I'm Smiling" crescendo and landed every note with precision, technique, character and strength, even when her blocking had her sitting and eating chips during one of the toughest songs in the show ("I Can Do Better Than That"). Unafraid of surrendering vain perfection to character poignancy, Ryan’s performance was an achievement character-wise as well as musically, a rarity among vocalists of her caliber.

Ultimately, the challenge of mounting
The Last Five Years at all should earn Vetoed Productions (just now completing their first season in existence) some serious theatre cred. The fact that it was as well-executed as it was only serves to warn the Toronto theatre community of what's coming: a tribe of some VERY determined students who show no signs of ever backing down from a challenge.

The Last Five Years
' final performances are Saturday May 29th at 2pm and 8pm at The Berkeley Street Upstairs Theatre.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

A Different Kind of Theatre


In Defense of Faires as Theatre
or
I just can’t wait for Faire Season
by Jim Melo

For those of us who worship Hugh Laurie for his portrayal of Dr. Gregory House, I’m sure no one even considered for a second missing last week's episode. For those of you who don’t, I’ll explain.

Last week (not this past Monday, but the Monday before. I’ve been swamped with work) Dr. House treated a Renaissance Faire actor for a slew of problems, eventually diagnosing him with Anabolic Steroid use accelerated by being poisoned with Hemlock. When I saw the episode, I couldn't believe it. Two of my great loves, Dr. House (hey, don’t judge) and Ren Faires brought together at last! Then it occurred to me: most people either don’t go to Faires or don’t respect them in the slightest.

Fine, I thought, people just suck. While that’s probably true (people DO suck), there’s also a lot of people who just don’t know what a Faire is all about. In fact, there’s plenty of theater people who don’t even realize that Ren Faires are as much legitimate theater as any production of Shakespeare.

What most people think about Renaissance Faires is that they’re populated entirely by geeks and/or nerds, or people who are just too insane for everyday life and prefer playing dress up. Well, I’m sure that’s true for some people (personally, I’m both a geek AND insane), but most of the actors at Faires are extremely professional performers. In fact, I myself once acted in a Renaissance Faire, The Connecticut Renaissance Faire to be precise. The people that I met doing the Faire were all phenomenally talented actors, many of whom had been or still were active in regular theater productions.

Faires themselves are really just extended runs of shows that happen in various stages throughout the day. The actors rehearse for months, learn blocking, lines, and choreography of all kinds, and by the time the show goes up, it’s a highly polished, professional production. In fact, the only real difference between Ren Faires and regular Theater is the effect that they’re trying to create. In Theater, the effect that is being created is that there is a story unfolding in front of you, and you get to sit and watch it. With Ren Faires, there is a story unfolding around you, and you get to walk through it, look at it from different angles, and be a part of it.

For me, Faire season in the north east is the highlight of my year. My season usually starts in June with the Silver Kingdom Renaissance Festival, has a brief jaunt over to King Richard’s Faire sometime during September, and ends with the Connecticut Renaissance Faire in October. Of course, that season changes all the time depending on whether or not I’m acting in a Faire (I am this year), and the fact that the Connecticut Faire is now holding two festivals, one in the spring and one in autumn (I’m going to both).

I’ve been going to Faires ever since my family took me to one in middle school and said “Jim, I think we found your people.” I usually go with a group of my friends, anywhere between two people and ten, depending on how many we managed to rope into coming with us. Faires are a great way to get out, enjoy the weather on a beautiful day, dress up in funny clothes, and get to be someone that you aren’t for a while. And hell, it’s always great to step outside your comfort zone every once in a while, so why not do it somewhere where not only is it perfectly alright to carry a sword around, but where you feel slightly under-dressed without one?

For more information about the Faires I mentioned above, feel free to check out these links:
Silver Kingdom Renaissance Festival- http://www.kingdomfestival.com/
A Festival running two weeks in the middle of June.

The Connecticut Renaissance Faire- http://ctfaire.com/
A Faire which runs two festivals, one in May and one in October

King Richard’s Faire- http://kingrichardsfaire.net/
A large Faire running August through October

Saturday, May 1, 2010

The Fantasy of The Queens


by Tessa Cernik

I must first admit that it took me a few days to gather my thoughts about Alumnae Theatre's production of The Queens by Normand Chaurette, translated by Linda Gaboriau. Upon my return to Toronto after a year of participating in the Halifax theatre scene, I was very excited to get the opportunity to start my summer of great Torontonian theatre with the Alumnae Theatre Company. Yet I was admittedly a bit thrown by their production; which I see now is exactly the intention of this play.

As I walked very speedily (I was running a tad late) towards the theatre (a beautifully converted firehall on Berkeley Street) I was a bit apprehensive: I have never read Richard III (the Shakespeare play The Queens expounds upon) and I am not overly familiar with the War of the Roses of 15th century Britain. I was afraid the play would be lost on me because of my lack of historical knowledge of the period. Yet the production, I quickly learned, is not about history. Yes, all the characters are historical figures and the underlying conflict is accurate, but the play, I found, is much more of a fantastical exploration of the human relationship to power than a historically accurate depiction of events. Mat Howard puts it beautifully in his director's note: "This is not Richard III - the Queens lurk in Shakespeare's margins, but are not the same characters...Just as Shakespeare spun his elaborate fiction from history, Chaurette weaves his play from the threads of story Shakespeare left untended, creating a play that is utterly new and compelling."

And how compelling it was! As the lights dim, the audience is hit with the power and tension of Rick Jones's original score, sung by the three Chorus members (Danielle Capretti, Kat Lai and Kat Letwin), who were accompanied by a synthesized brass quartet. As a person who has studied Medieval and Renaissance music, I was shocked by the dissonance and unsettling feeling the music evoked; quite a departure from the feeling of traditional music of the period. But as the play began, I saw how necessary it was for Jones to compose a score with the same intensity and menace as Chaurette's words. The Chorus sang Jones's intricate and difficult harmonies beautifully, adding an invaluble element to the production. Heather Schibli's costumes coupled with Jen Rovinelli's makeup, hair and millinery design were stunning, which again added to the incredible production value of the show.

However, it was the acting that was most compelling for me as an audience member. As a stage manager, I am well aware of how little recognition the behind-the-scenes crew receives from an audience when compared to the amount of work and dedication they have put into a show. But without a good crew holding the technical aspects of a show together, action on stage cannot be affective for an audience. Thus I commend director Mat Howard, producer/assistant director Catherine Driscoll, assistant producer Christine Leung, stage manager Lynda Yearwood and all other members of the production team for enabling me to become so engrossed by the words and emotions of the actors.

The Queens boasts an impressive ensemble cast, composed of women ranging in age and experience but all brilliantly capable in their ability to present their characters. It was obvious in their on-stage interactions that these women have formed a strong bond as a cast, for which I congratulate them, as the evident respect for each other added a lot to the integrity of the show. The high degree of dimension in each character was also evident, especially in Meghan McNicol's portrayal of Anne Warwick and Janice Tate's Cecily, Duchess of York. Both women had exemplary expression and energy that permeated the audience. I was absolutely stunned by McNicol's beautifully delivered openning monologue, which presented the perfect mixture of young naivete and cruel ambition, as well as set the tone of the play and a high level of expectation for the rest of the performance. Nonnie Griffin delivered well placed comic relief and palpable emotional turmoil as Queen Margaret and Elaine Lindo gained my utmost sympathy for her Queen Elizabeth. Jessica Moss, a fellow King's Theatrical Society member, was both nervous energy and exploding passion as Isabel Warwick and when Patricia Hammond as the mute Anne Dexter spoke for the first time in act two, I was stunned by her ability to convey such raw, true human emotion.

When I left the threatre, I truly did not know if I had liked The Queens. It was not until I sat down to write this article did my feelings come to a head: I loved this play. And the fact that I have been thinking about it for two days straight proves to me that the play itself and the production put on by Alumnae Theatre are both fantastically compelling. Howard writes that "The Queens asks us to suspend our disbelief and trust in the magic of the theatre", and the Alumnae Theatre Company's production helped me to do just that.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Welcome to Stratford

The summer will soon be upon us and that means many things. It's baseball season, Dream in High Park starts (relatively) soon, al fresco dining is back within the realm of possibility. But most important of all, it means the start of a new season at The Stratford Shakespeare Festival, my personal favourite destination for theatre in the whole world. I'm hoping to see every play on their roster this summer and my annual Stratford weekend with fellow My Theatre writer Tessa is already in the works. This year's season is as follows:

The Tempest
As You Like It
The Winter's Tale
Two Gentlemen of Verona
Peter Pan
Dangerous Liaisons
Do Not Go Gentle
King of Thieves
Jaques Brel is a Alive and Well and Living in Paris
For the Pleasure of Seeing Her Again
Kiss Me Kate
and
Evita

Click Here to watch an excellent ad for festival student discounts that shows you everything I love about Ontario. It starts in Toronto and takes you to Stratford where you see the theatre store, balzac's cafe, foster's inn and the famed festival theatre- the greatest place on earth.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Shakespeare is more amazing than you give him credit for

Much Ado About a Midsummer Night’s King Macbeth IV Part 2

or

Remembering William Shakespeare

On this most auspicious of days, April 23- Shakespeare's birthday, I thought that I might take a moment or two to remember one of the greatest men who ever lived.

Shakespeare was, both in my opinion and in the opinion of most of the intelligent people in the world, the most brilliant writer who ever put pen to paper. As a theater buff, actor, and director, I find it almost impossible to find any writer that even comes close to measuring up to the immortal Bard. So, that being said, let’s get on to the actual point of this rant—giving you REASONS that Shakespeare is, in fact, better than you will EVER be.

1. Shakespeare invented words. Lots of them.

You know the term “eyeballs”? Yeah, Shakespeare invented that expression. The verb “to ensnare”? Strait out of Othello. The word “fashionable”? Shakespeare. Yeah, that’s right. Shakespeare either invented or was the first to write down more words than any other author in the history of the English language. By some accounts, he invented more than 1,700 words and phrases. Yeah, this one old English guy made up more words than most high school students are even capable of putting down in an essay (and that’s including repeating “a” as many times as they possibly can).

2. Shakespeare died at the rich old age of 52.

Shakespeare was recorded to have died at the age of 52 (on his birthday, by the way). Generally, it’s accepted that Shakespeare’s theatrical career began sometime in the 1580s, and that it ended around 1613. So he was writing for (quick math here)...about 30 years, give or take. In the course of about 30 years, he churned out 38 plays. For those of us who AREN’T mathematically impaired, that’s more than a play a year, and almost all of them are masterpieces (Comedy of Errors excepted). In the amount of time that it takes some people to pay off their college debt, Shakespeare wrote some of the greatest works ever written.

3. If it’s been done, Shakespeare did it first.

If anything has ever been done by anyone, Shakespeare’s already done it. I DARE you to think of one thing that’s been done by anyone ever that Shakespeare didn’t in some way write about first. For example, let’s pick one of the most (pathetically) modern things I can think of: the “your mom” joke. Surely that’s a modern thing that Shakespeare had never even...oh wait, Titus Andronicus. And I quote:

Demetrius: Villain, what hast thou done?
Aaron: That which thou canst not undo.
Chiron: Thou hast undone our mother.
Aaron: Villain, I have done thy mother.”

Yeah, that’s right. Shakespeare was making jokes about your mother’s promiscuity before your great great great grandparents were born.

4. Shakespeare died in 1616

1616! As in the early 17th century. As in 394 years ago. So nearly 400 years after his death, we’re STILL talking about just how awesome Shakespeare was. You know what people are going to probably say about me 400 years after my death? I imagine it going something like this:

Person 1: So, have you heard of this Jim guy?
Person 2: No, who’s that?
Person 1: No idea. [long pause] What were we talking about again?
Person 3: Hey guys, want to take a day trip to Mars?”

Yeah. No one’ll be talking about how awesome I am 400 years from now, and yet here we are continuing to say how much of a genius Shakespeare was. I mean, the fact that we know his name 400 years later is pretty awesome, considering that there were kind of a lot of people in London in the early 1600s.

5. Dick Jokes.

Jokes about guys named Richard (ala Richard III) and jokes about the male anatomy. And female anatomy. And all things dirty, raunchy, and otherwise inappropriate for discussion in front of your grandmother (in case you couldn’t tell, I like making fun of your ancestors).

Anyway, Shakespeare wrote more dick jokes than possibly any other famous dead white guy. In fact, the entire plot of one of his most well known works, Romeo & Juliet can be boiled down to a series of off-colour jokes about how the two main characters just really want to do each other. Hell, even the priests get in on the fun-- Friar Laurence and Romeo have a great conversation about how the good Friar suspects he spent the night with Rosaline rather than sleeping.


So, let’s go ahead and consider that for a minute. Shakespeare is great. Greater than anyone else who has ever written, and pretty much anyone who will ever write. So, on this most auspicious of days, let us raise our glasses to the immortal bard, and remember him for the incredible plays that continue to be popular even 400 years after his death.

Happy Birthday Shakespeare



Yes, that's right kids, it's April 23. Which means that it's Shakespeare's birthday! It's also Shakespeare's deathday (spooky, I know) but that's depressing, so we're going to focus on the fact that it's his birthday.

In honour of this most prestigious of days, I offer you a list of my 15 favourites from the illustrious 38.

15) Titus Andronicus: my good friends the Calliope Players recently tackled this troublesome piece with dignity and artistry, thus redefining it for me.

14) Othello: though plagued with the least sympathetic hero ever, this story finds redemption in well-played Desdemonas and Emilias and the knowledge that it is "Othello's tragedy, but Iago's play".

13) Henry 4th part 1: prince Hal just might be the most human of all history play characters. I've met many a prince Hal in my time and liked them all. Add a little Hotspur and a lot of Falstaff and you've got yourself a mighty fine play.

12) A Midsummer Night's Dream: the Athenian lovers never fail to entertain and when played correctly the fairy court can be incredibly moving. This play is also open to great artistic interpretation. But that act five, I never quite can get over how stupid it is.

11) Twelfth Night: this beautifully melancholy, outrageously funny piece is weighed down only by the annoying fact of its convenient twin plotline. As the first Shakespeare play I ever studied and the first professional production I ever saw (The Stratford Shakespeare Festival, 2001), Twelfth Night will always hold a special place in my heart.

10) Hamlet: some brilliant themes, complex characters and classic lines make this the most famous thing in the world. A reason to like it I'm sure but also the reason I tend to think it's both brilliant and overrated. Especially hard to play because of the hero's wordiness, Hamlet is a rare Shakespeare that I believe works better on the page than the stage.

9) The Tempest: there's an ethereal magic about The Tempest that draws me in every time. The 2005 production that I saw in Stratford, ON was the great William Hutt's last role, something I will forever be grateful that I witnessed.

8) Much Ado About Nothing: there are few things I love more than banter. I also like smart people, strong people and fiercely loyal people. Much Ado's got all that. A delightful film version with the two actors born to play Beatrice and Benedick (Emma Thompson and Kenneth Branagh) doesn't hurt.

7) Julius Caesar: last season's Stratford production was my first true introduction to this remarkable piece and it is not one I will soon forget.

6) Merchant of Venice: I firmly believe that this is a tragedy not a comedy and that Shakespeare intended it to be so. I firmly believe that if Shylock's forced conversion at the end was intended to be taken lightly, Shakespeare never would have let him speak such humanizing lines as "if you prick us do we not bleed?". The incredible humanity that exists in these characters is unparalleled, it is a rare and remarkable glimpse of characters who live completely in the grey area between hero and villain.

5) Richard III: a favourite of college professors, Richard III exists on my bookshelf in at least 7 different volumes. And each time I study it I'm taken even further aback by its complexity. As a piece of Tudor propoganda, as historical fiction, as a humanizing character study, as a guide to oratory and poetic device, Richard III works.

4) Romeo & Juliet: over-exposure and belittling interpretation has made this play mockable, but in it the unpretentious examiner will find some of the greatest love poetry ever written, characters so unique that actors flock to them even if they only speak 30 lines or appear in the first 2 acts, and a human story of extreme beauty and folly.

3) Macbeth: my love of Macbeth most likely stems from a highschool production, to this day one of the best I've ever been a part of. But the captivating spiral of darkness, the terrifying allure of the main antiheroes and the intense watchability of this piece keeps me on my toes every time I see it.

2) As You Like It: the only Shakespeare with a true heroine at its core, As You Like It is an ode to the non-ingenue young woman. Liberated from the court that ties down so many other Shakespearean characters, those in As You Like It are free to frolic gaily in the woods and fall madly in love at a moment's notice. They banter sweetly, are not punished for pretention or simplicity and live in a world where one can write poetry on trees and break spontaneously into song. Depth and profundity live in a pretty pastoral box that brings the audience happiness against all odds.

1) King Lear: so much to say, so little space. Perhaps one day I will expound upon this, the greatest play I have ever known.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Oh The Thinks You Can Think!

Last weekend BU on Broadway premiered their spring mainstage production: a lighthearted and uplifting musical, a favourite of mine, Seussical. Though plagued with the occasional flaw, the production was for the most part absolutely wonderful and easily one of my favourite things I've seen in my time in Boston.

Seussical
itself, written by Ahrens and Flaherty, is a joyful romp of a show that leaves you smiling no matter what. Filled with memorable characters like Horton the Elephant and Gertrude McFuzz, beautiful ballads like "Alone in the Universe" and "Solla Sollew" and wonderfully kitschy dialogue that strictly adheres to Dr. Seuss' famous rhyming couplet format, Seussical is really a wonderful play. Right off the bat with the raucously great opening number "Oh The Thinks You Can Think", Seussical inhabits a colourful world filled with cats in hats, sour kangaroos, trouble-making monkeys and birds of a single feather. The world of Seuss is one where the "smallest of small" and the "largest of all" can be friends and anything can happen if you "just think".

If the play has a problem, it's that it significantly longer than the story can support. Though filled with show-stopping wonderful songs like "Oh The Thinks You Can Think", "It's Possible", "Alone in the Universe", "Notice Me, Horton" and "Solla Sollew", Seussical is polluted by no fewer than 32 other musical numbers. Dull duds like "Circus McGurkus" take up time and barely move the plot forward, basically serving as a platform for some of Seuss' quirky but neglected characters to show make their mark on the play. But ultimately, the adorable wonderfulness of Horton, Gertrude and Jojo's journeys overshadows any tedium and keeps the audience on board the cooky coupleted ride of Seussical the Musical.

BU On Broadway's production perfectly encapsulated what Seussical is all about. As directed by the company's resident ingenue Sarah Jill Bashein (whose recent credits include Belle in Beauty and the Beast, Janet in Rocky Horror and Woman #1 in Songs for a New World), Seussical was appropriately bold and colourful, sweet and poignant, goofy but smart. The Seuss illustration-inspired set allowed for great levels and a good sense of location with trees on wheels to represent the Jungle of Nool and little Who houses to be wheeled in when the action moves to Whoville. The costumes were sweet and representational- no wings, no trunks, but rather animal ears and feathered dresses paired with character movement that struck the delicate balance of a personified animal in child-inspired detail. The audio levels needed a little more refining but the orchestra and vocals, music directed by wunderkind Jonathan Brenner, were standout.

Overall, the story and characters were represented well. The choreography, though simple, was beautiful and the lighting stunning. The blocking was well thought-out and the characters well defined.

The crucial role of Horton was played by the always excellent Matt Lerner, who's beautiful tenor voice was in fine form this week alongside his incomparable charm and emotional commitment. Easily one of my favourite performers of the company, Lerner will be missed once he graduates this spring after a run of leading roles including The Baker in Into the Woods, Jimmy in Reefer Madness, Seymour in Little Shop of Horrors, Brad in Rocky Horror and Man #2 in Songs for a New World.

Also in fine form was relative newcomer Colleen Martorano who brought great energy to the role of Mayzie LaBird. Jessie Kavanagh's Jojo was charming and well executed, while one of OB's newest superstars Stephanie Gray stole most of the Whoville scenes as Mrs. Mayor with her stunning soprano and never-failing animation. The highlight of the stellar chorus was OB Vice President Matt Cobb in typically enthusiastic fashion.

Tavia Merchant's Sour Kangaroo was brash acting-wise but her vocal chops proved enough to temporarily make you forget to keep breathing. Liz Furze, as Gertrude McFuzz, was one of the few castmembers to struggle with her vocals (much of "All for You" was lost to inaudible high notes) but she was so thoroughly charming and sounded so beautiful on the notes that were in her range that she was still a resounding success in the role.

Basically Seussical comes down to the audience. You can be that person, who sits there and laments every simplistic musical theme, cheap pun or missed note. But if you're not, if you're someone who can enjoy the theatre for all its imperfections, Seussical, especially Bashein's BU On Broadway production, can be the happiest show on earth.

*This article has been edited to exclude a mildly negative mention of a performer who wishes to not appear on the website.